What?
New names dug up by Magicians?

I think some of the larger pieces that were not uncovered and unsummoned would break off to smaller pieces which then make demons.

Possible.

Anything's possible, But until the possible becomes actual, it is only a distraction.

Nice quote. Who said it?

^Dansariki did. Ha.

As for my views being incorrect, all we see is a seething mass of colours, according to Kitty's description. So I've only elaborated what I've seen. I haven't changed what is in the books, but made sense of it.

Nectanebo wrote: ^Dansariki did. Ha.

As for my views being incorrect, all we see is a seething mass of colours, according to Kitty's description. So I've only elaborated what I've seen. I haven't changed what is in the books, but made sense of it.

Hah.
And fair enough.
I can't visualize what you're explaining, I suppose that's it.

I can't remember the page, but Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith, Mather Stover.
Kenobi negotiates a seemingly un-negotiatable fued bewteen Yoda and Mace, and they talkm and he says:
"Yes, but I can almost here Qui-Gon saying until the possible becomes actual, it is only a distraction."
And that's from memory in third period...
boy I'm good.

Whoa! Coincidentally enough, I got that book on CD yesterday!

Good for you, hope you enjoy it.

Gladstone wrote: :lol:

yea..........i'm not really sure, but i'm going to answer your question with another. In the second book bartimaeus talked about his youth...when he had a more grander entrance in the pentacle....if so how was he created from the other place....how did anyone know his name??

Exactly gladstone..how could anyone know anyone's name in the other place?and youth...there's no time there right..?so there should be no youth or old..apparently...
hmmm...but..i would really love to visit the OP..

Good point. How did they know Barty's name? Unless the magicians invented it during the summonings & the newest demon (which was born) was christened so or mightbe the demons which were already known to the magicians told them about the new-borns.

That's one of the things even Stroud has issues answering.
That's the thing about devout readers, they find things the authors themselves never thought about.

Dansariki wrote: That's one of the things even Stroud has issues answering.
That's the thing about devout readers, they find things the authors themselves never thought about.

It's not like there's anything wrong with it though.

Quite, it makes the books following it more interesting, and gives the author (and us) something to do with the time...

Dansariki wrote: Quite, it makes the books following it more interesting, and gives the author (and us) something to do with the time...

Exactly. Think, it's not illegal yet.


OK sure I copied that off a shirt but yeah you still get the point.

why would it be illegal, regardless?