Nathaniel Djinni
4 Jan 07 - 06:14
welcome to the forums, fredobar. Enjoy!
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.
The many magicians thing were needed to merely retain control of Nouda. Proof? We all agree that Nouda is more powerful than a marid, right? Then why was Nouda summoned by one magician, when a normal marid takes 2 of them?wrote:But to summon him in the first place should have required more magicians if he was as strong as Ramuthra.
Barti indeed said that, but how could Makepeace know this? Hopkins had told him that controlling the demon only took sheer will.wrote:Demons are only held into obedience by magicians' ability to punish them and bounds placed on them once they've been summoned preventing them from attacking the magician. Barti himself said that taking control of Nat's body would have been as simple as blocking off a couple of conduction pathways in his brain. No chance of Makepeace punishing Nouda, and no bounds placed preventing him harming Makepeace because it was his first summoning.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.

You: Ramuthra needs 4, Nouda needs 1, Ramuthra > Nouda.wrote:That sentence makes no sense whatsoever.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.

good pointIanna wrote: Not really debating or anything, but wasn't Nouda willing to come because he knew what lay ahead?
So couldn't he therefore have helped Makepeace by not struggling?

First, this implies Nouda was a mere marid, which he wasn't. Second, since Nouda was above marid, you're implying that Makepeace was at least 4 times stronger than a regular Parliament member, which I doubt..wrote:Like I said, Makepeace is a strong magician - strong enough to summon a spirit that would take two ordinary magicians singlehanded. The stronger the spirit, the harder it is to summon. However, even Makepeace had to work with others to summon Ramuthra.
You don't need control? Like hell you don't. He didn't want England to get destroyed.wrote:You're entirely wrong about number of magicians determining amount of control, because no control was required over Ramuthra. Ramuthra was inside a pentacle at all times and Lovelace had the Amulet of Samarkand, rendering him invincible to Ramuthra. They didn't need any control at all, yet it still took four magicians to summon him.
Faqural spoke to Nouda about the plan, so yes, he knew.wrote:I'm not sure... if Faquarl was bound into Hopkins' body, he wouldn't have been able to return to the Other Place and talk to Nouda... although I guess messengers might have worked.
Let's recap. Do you thing a spirit that destroyed Persepolis (the capital of the Persian Empire) would be normally summonable by a single magician?wrote:Regardless, Makepeace knew his own strength and would have known he could summon Nouda single handed - his mistake was thinking it was possible to prevent a spirit from killing its host by sheer willpower, which can't be done.
wrote:According to some, heroic deaths are admirable things. I've never been convinced by this argument, mainly because, no matter how cool, stylish, composed, unflappable, manly or defiant you are, at the end of the day you're also dead.