Artemis wrote: Flibbertigibet wrote: I guess that naming your child 'Ptolemy' back then was like naming him 'John' right now. It's been done before, and done better.
Only if you were a member of the royal family. In fact, in all there were (takes out her huge Egyptology textbook) 14 KINGS named Ptolemy.
Lazy morons. How long would it take to find a different name? I mean, it's not like Ptolemy is a really funny or cool name. And if they were a dynasty, could you imagine if there were several royal heirs running around named Ptolemy?
"Ptolemy, put down Ptolemy's food! Hey, Ptolemy, I told you that you couldn't have another sandwich! Ptolemy, why can't you be more like your brothers, Ptolemy, Ptolemy, Ptolemy, and Ptolemy? Honestly, Ptolemy, sometimes I wish you and Ptolemy could make up. Ptolemy. Ptolemy. Ptolemy. Ptolemy. Ptolemy. Ptolemy. Ptolemy."
And imagine taking census back then!