Chiz Ghul
14 Jul 09 - 16:40
i just watched Transformers 2. Then I checked out trans 1 and watched it like 3 1/2 times before returning it lol. I sort of like Starscream too
Ok, the reviews don't seem bad. The second link had directly opposing views....anyway, I am going to see the movie tomorrow. Had one hell of a time booking. I tried to book by the internet first in my favourite multiplex, but in a few seconds the seats had all disappeared in front of my eyes. Then I thought I would try telebooking from another multiplex, but the automated machine called the movie "Harry Potter OF the Half-Blood Prince' which made me laugh & snapped my concentration, so I had to start the whole damn process again.Nero wrote:Actually critics say that this is the best adaptation of the books that are released so far.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0417741/
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/harry_p ... od_prince/
Meh. I didn't watch it so I just trusted the critics.nathanielandbartimaeus wrote:Ugh, HBP was bad. You lose Nero(and I am sad about it-I wanted the movie to be good). I think it was the worst by far. The first half was comedy-ridden & though that's good, you seriously expect something more darker from the 6th book in the series. And the second half was even worse. The climax could have been loads better-the pain Harry showed during Cedric's & Sirius's death was far more emotive & seemed more genuine. And...I have a lot more complains, only it would be better if y'all judged the movie for yourselves. There were some positive points too-the trio's acting was definitely(in my eyes atleast) superior & there was Quidditch!!! And yup, there were more hilarious parts too (many thanks to Lavender).
That can only be a good thing.n&b wrote:...the trio's acting was definitely(in my eyes atleast) superior
The firebolt part pissed me off too. I think Cris Columbus was the best director-he cut out less stuffs & made it as similar to the book as possible. All the other directors were more interested in making the movie exclusively for teens than sticking to the storyline.Dansariki wrote:I thought it was the least satisfying.
Still satisfying, just not so much.
It was, at least, faster paced that Phoenix, which, while nice, got slow at times.
One helluva cliffhanger, wonderful setup for the next book...
I think that'll be the crux of the movie's success - the fact that it's mostly a prelude to the next one.
Which they split in two.
Stupid, but if it means they cut less out, then I'll deal.
I'm less about little changes (hell, I don't mind those) it's how, since the third film, they've modified major pieces (getting the Firebolt at the end pissed me off) and cut others entirely out.
You know, if there isn't a Firefox addon that does that, there really should be...rubberchickenben wrote:Strangely enough, I'm listening to the Williams theme. Ah, if only shuffle was more like Google Ads.
