indie2 Foliot
2 Jun 10 - 18:55
are you kidding me, nat was the best developed character i've ever read in a book. its the reason i read them!bartimaeus92 wrote:were the chars really under developed and snotty(i dont normaly use that word but we cant curse so um yah) <_<
but i would agree kitty was dissapointing compared to bart and nat. she wasn't a bad character she's the sort of character you expect in any book but she was just a bit boring compared to the other two.
edit : man i so should've looked at the date on this topic.
edit2 : are you lot talking about earthquakes? :blink: