Is It Just Me Or.....

Golem's Eye
User Avatar
indie2 Foliot
bartimaeus92 wrote:were the chars really under developed and snotty(i dont normaly use that word but we cant curse so um yah) <_<
are you kidding me, nat was the best developed character i've ever read in a book. its the reason i read them!

but i would agree kitty was dissapointing compared to bart and nat. she wasn't a bad character she's the sort of character you expect in any book but she was just a bit boring compared to the other two.

edit : man i so should've looked at the date on this topic.
edit2 : are you lot talking about earthquakes? :blink:
User Avatar
Chiz Ghul
indie2 wrote:
bartimaeus92 wrote:were the chars really under developed and snotty(i dont normaly use that word but we cant curse so um yah) <_<
are you kidding me, nat was the best developed character i've ever read in a book. its the reason i read them!

but i would agree kitty was dissapointing compared to bart and nat. she wasn't a bad character she's the sort of character you expect in any book but she was just a bit boring compared to the other two.

edit : man i so should've looked at the date on this topic.
edit2 : are you lot talking about earthquakes? :blink:
Ha new people are like this all the time
User Avatar
Gladstone Golem
admin
Sentynel wrote:university has taught me the meaning of sleep deprivation..
Same here, but for all the wrong reasons.
..Now I just realised the date of this topic xD
hi there
Gladstone wrote:
Sentynel wrote:university has taught me the meaning of sleep deprivation..
Same here, but for all the wrong reasons.
..Now I just realised the date of this topic xD
=p.

And I third the first sentence. Though my reason differs vastly from Gladstone's.
"If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination ... no more men!" - Einstein
"I like quoting Einstein. Know why? Because nobody dares contradict you." - Studs Terkel.
<@Ximenez> Sentynel: But i have a life? No. Qed.
Lemon Mite
Wasn't really the best book. I kinda liked the way Nat was shown, it made sense. It wouldn't really work if "all the other magicians were mean, nasty villains and nathaniel was really a good guy on the inside with a good heart and he wanted to stop there evil ways because he wasn't like most magicians, see" because all magicians came into the government raised the same way, and thus there would be no reason for any one of them to come out differently. Though, bart did say that he expected Nat to come out differently (in the middle of GE), and that unlike most magicians, he "had a conscience" (at the end of AoS).

Add Reply