Exactly. As simple as that is, the trust shall prevail! :DNathaniel wrote:Surely if you order someone to death because they have murdered then you are as bad as they are. A life for a life as it were. Much like the idea of of an eye for eye means we would all be blind.
The chair is my personal preference. Anyone who intentionally kills doesn't deserve to live. The earth is already getting too populated and keeping those who aren't usefull is a waste of space. Murders should be killed. If you feel that you are just as much at fualt if you kill them for justice, then instead of allowing soldiers to die, send the criminals off to war.. That way you aren't killing them, the enemy is.Nero wrote:Personally I think the death penalty is either too much or too little for criminals. Like Sent said, why hand out death so quickly? And most serial killers/ other nutter murderers have had abuse in the past. There is no such thing as a born nutter. Just some people are easier to push.
Though a shot to the head is a bit messy Sentynel. Most people want nice, clean bodies to bury. And apparently lethal injection is not as barbaric as killing assassination style. Not that there's any difference in how you kill someone.
AIONIOS...like the rest of the government then?Nathaniel wrote:Not admin for the government! They could cripple the country!
I find it laughable that there is an ideal that because there are so many damn people, that we should exploit ever way to decrease the population, by killing people.Adele wrote:The chair is my personal preference. Anyone who intentionally kills doesn't deserve to live. The earth is already getting too populated and keeping those who aren't usefull is a waste of space. Murders should be killed. If you feel that you are just as much at fualt if you kill them for justice, then instead of allowing soldiers to die, send the criminals off to war.. That way you aren't killing them, the enemy is.Nero wrote:Personally I think the death penalty is either too much or too little for criminals. Like Sent said, why hand out death so quickly? And most serial killers/ other nutter murderers have had abuse in the past. There is no such thing as a born nutter. Just some people are easier to push.
Though a shot to the head is a bit messy Sentynel. Most people want nice, clean bodies to bury. And apparently lethal injection is not as barbaric as killing assassination style. Not that there's any difference in how you kill someone.
Yes. So all we need to do is develop them!Sentynel wrote:As mentioned previously elsewhere, the population is relatively stable or even shrinking in most first-world countries. The vast majority of people and population growth are in poor nations.
AIONIOSUnfortunately, the children don't want to help with it, they have to in order to support the whole family.Adele wrote:A lot of undeveloped countries have many children to help with the work.
Apollo wrote:Killing "obsolete" people to benefit society is the most inhuman, digusting philosophy I've ever heard. If we did that, we are no better than Pol Pot.
No, the death penalty is disgusting. Who are we to judge who should live or die? And how are you setting a good example, if you yourself are killing someone. You are no better than them. And if you check the stats, death penalty doesn't actually deter crime. in fact, the murder rate in non-death penalty states is substantially lower.Adele wrote:Though a shot to the head is a bit messy Sentynel. Most people want nice, clean bodies to bury. And apparently lethal injection is not as barbaric as killing assassination style. Not that there's any difference in how you kill someone. ]The chair is my personal preference. Anyone who intentionally kills doesn't deserve to live. The earth is already getting too populated and keeping those who aren't usefull is a waste of space. Murders should be killed. If you feel that you are just as much at fualt if you kill them for justice, then instead of allowing soldiers to die, send the criminals off to war.. That way you aren't killing them, the enemy is.
AIONIOS
