So you're saying you could be corrupted?

I mean, you have shown your nastier side concerning Thomas, but that anger seemed to be Kitty like to me.

Once again...real life, you have not seen.

*shrugs*

Give me an essay length post of how you act in real life and post it in the spamzone. If it's convincing enough, I just might believe you.

I can't.

I'm already doing three 500 word essays.

Besides, I don't have to prove anything to you.

But I just might when I get unbusy.

You see, this is what I went through Ianna. Don't do it! Fight the power! :P

Silence, little moddy! :D

I'll do what I want.

And right now, that's sitting down, relaxing.

I think, the main character in the first book is Nat, in the second book it's Kitty and in the last book it's Bartimaeus (because his story about him and ptolemy is told). But that's my opinion ;)

Hmm. Good compromise.

Oh, and .

Have a cookie.

Hey there! I'm feeling generous today. ;) Anyway, I'd say like in all books there is more than one main character. (In this case there's three, Nat, Barti, and Kitty) But that in this case it's quite hard to distinguish between the three who takes centre stage. I'd have to say Nat or Barti until I read Stroud's answers where he said Nat is the main focus.

I suppose Nat is the main character...

hello! ;) thanks for the cookies :)

have a shipping propaganda smilie :love3:

I think Nat was the main character because the story was about his life. Barti was only the narrartor.

Excatly.

Like I've been saying all along.

Aye, but the suthor said so, so Barti is the main character. Wait. What?

I've now come to the conclusion that Nat is the main character of the first book, Kitty of the second and barti of the last

Kitty isn't second, Barti is!

Exactly, Thank-you Luciene, I agree Barti's second. Ugh... I got that virus that's been going around. Dammit! *Hack!* *Cough!*

Gah! It's infected! *runs screaming from the room*

Second book.

Not the second main character.