Queezle7 Horla
17 Aug 07 - 22:27
meh.
Better than my dog.
She's afraid of most floor surfaces.
Better than my dog.
She's afraid of most floor surfaces.
Look, Queezle.
Quite understandable.Vinr Alfakyn wrote: And obsessed w/ tennis balls.![]()
Oh, Canada...Note to JK: When you don't have enough kids to name all the dead people after you've killed too many.Jen wrote: are we to name kids after ALL the dead oddities in HP? Hmm?
Ya I agree with u. Harry deserves a happy life after all his sufferings - & what he got in the end was just a normal life like v all usually lead. What is so sugar sweet about the epilogue? JK herself has said a lightining cannot strike the same tree twice so v can't expect Harry to lead a dangerous & troubled life again. It would seem too fairytale - like to bestow another adventure on Harry & co. Harry deserves a happy, peaceful & normal life. So what is so hateful about the editorial? IF Harry & co did'nt enjoy their life,what was the use of Fred, Lupin, Tonks, Dobby etc etc to die? Their death atleast has ensured a bright life for the survivers. What v learn from the epilogue is to move on, irrespective of what took place in the past. If Harry still mourned & lead a depressed life, the deaths of his friends would have been in vain. They died to reconstruct a better world - & their last wish luckily, got fulfilled.Mwamba wrote: She killed in quantity but the characters killed weren't *that* major.
Sure there were deaths, but that's kind of expected. Personally, I think the bloodbath hype is way too much. Isn't the happily-ever-after ending good enough for y'all?
An amazing individual? For reals? Now, I give him props for rebelling against Umbridge, but I think 'amazing' is just exaggerated. He's just a minor, fictional character.Queezle7 wrote: He is an amazing individual who did not deserve to die.
That because JKR wrote the cr-epilogue way back when she started. She locked it in a drawer only to open it just as she was finishing DH. Laziness and brilliance all in one?wrote:Try reading book 1 again - it suddenly seems so childish.
Uhhhh...I feel kind of bad having to say it, but I loathed the epilogue and find the only thing 'well' about the epilogue is AS/S.nathanielandbartimaeus wrote:Ya I agree with u. Harry deserves a happy life after all his sufferings - & what he got in the end was just a normal life like v all usually lead. What is so sugar sweet about the epilogue? JK herself has said a lightining cannot strike the same tree twice so v can't expect Harry to lead a dangerous & troubled life again. It would seem too fairytale - like to bestow another adventure on Harry & co. Harry deserves a happy, peaceful & normal life. So what is so hateful about the editorial? IF Harry & co did'nt enjoy their life,what was the use of Fred, Lupin, Tonks, Dobby etc etc to die? Their death atleast has ensured a bright life for the survivers. What v learn from the epilogue is to move on, irrespective of what took place in the past. If Harry still mourned & lead a depressed life, the deaths of his friends would have been in vain. They died to reconstruct a better world - & their last wish luckily, got fulfilled.Mwamba wrote: She killed in quantity but the characters killed weren't *that* major.
Sure there were deaths, but that's kind of expected. Personally, I think the bloodbath hype is way too much. Isn't the happily-ever-after ending good enough for y'all?
So please don't go on about the epilogue, it was the best ending Jo could give 2 her series. I suppose v got 2 used 2 dark & dangerous things in DH that the epilogue seemed out of place. Try reading book 1 again - it suddenly seems so childish. The same applies 2 book 6, where v see Harry worried about Quidditch & homework & stuff. Book 7 is way 2 darker!
I also suggest ( to people who r still convinced the epilogue is crap) to read the Mugglenet Editorial " All is well".
JK is changing her mind left right and center. In the interview that started this topic she said Ron and Harry became aurors.