The Best of the Three?

Amulet Of Samarkand

Is AoS the best of the three books?

Yes
No
User Avatar
Apocrypha Afrit
Wow, a revival, didn't see that coming.
Smeagol Mite
On topic guys. i know this is days late, but still...
User Avatar
Nathaniel Djinni
they don't have to on topic if they don't want to
User Avatar
Sentynel One with The Other Place
admin
This is astonishingly on topic for a thread ten pages down the line (and six months dead).
Sentynel - Head Ninja, Admin, Keeper of the Ban Afrit, Official Forum Graphics Guy, and forum code debugger.
A still more glorious dawn awaits, not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise, a morning filled with 400 billion suns - the rising of the Milky Way
User Avatar
Rekhyt2238 Utukku
Sentynel wrote: This is astonishingly on topic for a thread ten pages down the line (and six months dead).
Ten pages later, if we're still talking about the trilogy, it's suprisingly on topic. :D
The Mona Lisa:

User Avatar
Artemis Afrit
Rekhyt2238 wrote:
Sentynel wrote: This is astonishingly on topic for a thread ten pages down the line (and six months dead).
Ten pages later, if we're still talking about the trilogy, it's suprisingly on topic. :D
Isn't that the same thing as what he just said?
I say night I'm living in the forest of my dream,
I know the night is not as it would seem,
I must believe in something,
So I'll make myself believe it,
That this night will never go.


Laura Branigan, Self-control

:mouth: Oh, Canada...
User Avatar
Rekhyt2238 Utukku
Somewhat...He was talking about this topic, I was talking about all topics...
The Mona Lisa:

User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
I think that AoS is the best. I personally enjoyed the story more. The fact that we got to see Nathaniels childhood and not his...dare i say boring rising through parliament. I do Law in college...and it gets mentioned alot in the GE and PG. This made my enjoyment of latter books less than that of the first. They are still boss of course, but i did prefer AoS. :mwamba:
Yakaii Ghul
It's not my fav but Nat's past is cool... ^^
"Is that a unicorn? No I'll wear the purple shoes and who painted the kitten?"
User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
^^ yeah his past certainly shows him in a more positive light than in the later books, where he is just plain annoying. haha
Well I'm the opposite, I found the 'parliamentary aspect' of the books fascinating. Nat as a child was just like any unhappy orphan in literature.
Nothing to see here, move along.
User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
Good Point, i meant about his lessons with Miss lutyens and getting Bartimaeus to stral the amulet etc. don't get me wrong, the parliamentry side is interesting in a way, even though i said it was boring. i still believe the GE and PS are fantastic books.
This was my favourite book out of the three. I dont know why i just thought that Nathaniels childhood was very interesting. I probably like it better because it has more footnotes by Barti than the others do, and they where really funny.
User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
good point about the footnotes, i enjoy them alot aswell, they make bartimaeus seem alot more witty and humourus
Yeah i like them, the books would still be good if they weren't there, but they wouldn't be half as funny.
User Avatar
Rekhyt2238 Utukku
The Relaxed Reason wrote: Yeah i like them, the books would still be good if they weren't there, but they wouldn't be half as funny.
I don't think they would be even close to as good without the footnotes...Without them Barti looses a lot of his personality...
The Mona Lisa:

User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
Yeah, the footnotes did make the story a lot more fun..., but still, even without them, Bart would still have alot of personality just from his dialogue.
User Avatar
Adele Djinni
I didn't know what footnotes were when I was reading AoS and when I got halfway through I found out, and started over so it filled in the blanks! :hmm:
AIONIOS
User Avatar
Faquarl Ghul
haha i didn't know what they were on the first few pages, but then i realised and backtracked abit.
User Avatar
Adele Djinni
at least I am not the only one!
AIONIOS

Add Reply