Abel Afrit
7 Sep 08 - 20:25
how so?
I love that, after years of not using this forum, my average posts per day is 0.7
Not usually.XxHogwartsHokagexX wrote:But like Nero said, don't private school kids behave better than public schoolers...supposedly?
*Sigh* and you say all this because you have first hand expeirnce of private schools? ^o)Nero wrote:Not usually.XxHogwartsHokagexX wrote:But like Nero said, don't private school kids behave better than public schoolers...supposedly?
That's why I put it in quotations.
See, now, two reasons:
1) usually they're rich, which means they appear to be good kids, but are really stuck up, selfish and foolish kids, naive and babied by their parents. Usually. Rarely will there be
A) Someone at the private school not rich.
B) Thus, even rarely that they won't be stuck up, selfish and naive.
2) Also, think of it as like a Catholic school; said school puts a lot more restrictions than public, I believe that private ones put even more on. So then they can't release all the adolescence energy. They are conformed. Or attempted to be. If they are conformed, they'll usually go out with a bang. Either way; either conformed, or wild.
So really, parents think that putting kids in private schools help their innocence. Really it just slows it down and makes it worse.
That's my point of view at least.
YeahAbel wrote:sent's right. it costs about £40,000-45,000 per year for my sister and i to go to this school. the army helps out but that is still about 3/4 of what my parents make. it means we have to go without a sh!t load of stuff that other kids have. tbh ive found its the scholarship pupils who are stuck up.
I went to a Catholic private school for a long time.Nero wrote:Not usually.XxHogwartsHokagexX wrote:But like Nero said, don't private school kids behave better than public schoolers...supposedly?
That's why I put it in quotations.
See, now, two reasons:
1) usually they're rich, which means they appear to be good kids, but are really stuck up, selfish and foolish kids, naive and babied by their parents. Usually. Rarely will there be
A) Someone at the private school not rich.
B) Thus, even rarely that they won't be stuck up, selfish and naive.
2) Also, think of it as like a Catholic school; said school puts a lot more restrictions than public, I believe that private ones put even more on. So then they can't release all the adolescence energy. They are conformed. Or attempted to be. If they are conformed, they'll usually go out with a bang. Either way; either conformed, or wild.
So really, parents think that putting kids in private schools help their innocence. Really it just slows it down and makes it worse.
That's my point of view at least.
That might also be the reason why some kids are home-schooled.Apollo wrote:And maybe, parents put their children in private schools because they love them and want them to haveget a good education and moral compass.
no actually, i didnt know the two of you were on them :p, if i did i forgot about it.Nathaniel wrote:YeahAbel wrote:sent's right. it costs about £40,000-45,000 per year for my sister and i to go to this school. the army helps out but that is still about 3/4 of what my parents make. it means we have to go without a sh!t load of stuff that other kids have. tbh ive found its the scholarship pupils who are stuck up.
...is that last comment a dig at me and Sent? :P