Haha...nice. Don't you mean synaesthesia?

Artemis wrote: I didn't get that one.

The joke?

No, I mean i didn't get dyslexia.

I have tourettes syndrome, I have Obsessive Compulsive disorder and I have synaesthesia. (The first time was a typo)

Rekhyt2238 wrote:

edynn wrote:

Luciene wrote:

edynn wrote: Yo ucan't argue that Jane and Nat are similar.

You do realize I'm shipping John/Jane. That's is during GE. Nat's dead, you can't ship him.

And you admitted it yourself, they are similar, that's a lot shipping potential right there

no.. i meant you can't argue FOR jane and john being similar. because they aren't. i was unclear. apologies.

They actually are quite similar...

Yes.
They're both a little power-hungry.
They work together, and are both probably very overworked.
They're both fairly young and in positions of power.
They look similar.
They're both magicians.
They were both abandoned at birth.
They're both privileged, as high payed members of the gov't
Both probably very much in the public eye

There's more, I could go on forever. So, obviously, Jane would understand John much better than Kitty.

Edit: Why do they have to have such a hard word for a reading disorder? I still read it dylesic or something.

Luciene wrote:

Rekhyt2238 wrote:

edynn wrote:

Luciene wrote:

edynn wrote: Yo ucan't argue that Jane and Nat are similar.

You do realize I'm shipping John/Jane. That's is during GE. Nat's dead, you can't ship him.

And you admitted it yourself, they are similar, that's a lot shipping potential right there

no.. i meant you can't argue FOR jane and john being similar. because they aren't. i was unclear. apologies.

They actually are quite similar...

Yes.
They're both a little power-hungry.
They work together, and are both probably very overworked.
They're both fairly young and in positions of power.
They look similar.
They're both magicians.
They were both abandoned at birth.
They're both privileged, as high payed members of the gov't
Both probably very much in the public eye

There's more, I could go on forever. So, obviously, Jane would understand John much better than Kitty.

she might understand his situation better, but not himself better.

besides, being in a relationship with someone that is like you would be like being with yourself. can we say weird.

nat would be so better off with kitty.

Mwamba wrote: *Necropost.*

GODAMN YOU PEOPLE! I ressurrect a thread in hopes of a flame war, and what do I see!? Pleasant chit chat!

Gah.

At times like this I need this smiley

Understanding his situation is still a step closer than Kitty.

And Harry and Ginny are alike, but no one complains about that (except me)

pi-fan92 wrote: nat would be so better off with kitty.

In what ways? Will Kitty lead him to the path of moral non-magical commoner-y goodness?

Luciene wrote: And Harry and Ginny are alike, but no one complains about that (except me)

Uhhh ...She bugs me.

Kitty's a stronger person, who doesn't doesn't hang around him just to firgure out how to destroy him.

well its seems i was forced to take a side, and the more i think about it, the more i agrees! J/J!!!

lost another one to j/j.

Boy am I happy I'm neutral, I can just stand on the sideline s and watch the blood spill.

BreAnn wrote: well its seems i was forced to take a side, and the more i think about it, the more i agrees! J/J!!!

Yeah, that happened to me too. :lol:

It's the magic of JJ. You can't escape it.

It's magic and logic.

And, um...just completly right xD

Yes, magic and logic make for a good ship...

what do any of you know about magic and logic.

nat/kitty forever!!!!

Pssh I know everything about magic..I happen to be magic, and have a massive amount of logic...xD




I can pretend...