AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! HE'S A WOLF! CLEARLY HE'S WOLF! =PSentynel wrote:Yeah. Believe it or not, the villagers do win sometimes. They just need to act less like a band of headless chickens.Nero wrote:No. Then that's too easy. Just because we've failed to cooperate together properly doesn't mean we need assistance. If you really want to get into the role playing aspect of this game, having three villagers not voting would be very suspicious.
They, as in the general class of hypothetical villagers.Nero wrote:AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! HE'S A WOLF! CLEARLY HE'S WOLF! =PSentynel wrote:Yeah. Believe it or not, the villagers do win sometimes. They just need to act less like a band of headless chickens.Nero wrote:No. Then that's too easy. Just because we've failed to cooperate together properly doesn't mean we need assistance. If you really want to get into the role playing aspect of this game, having three villagers not voting would be very suspicious.
There were lengthy, well-reasoned, logical paragraphs in the last game? Also Sent's usually the one making logical comments on most threads...Didier wrote:
And from experience hosting the last game, when someone writes a lengthy, well-reasoned, logical paragraph, they're probably innocent. So Sentynel is probably not a wolf.
And Wolfboy (now Mwamba) has been absent the entire game, yet the wolf-killings have been fairly efficiently delivered, so he/she is innocent.
Sure, no problem.Didier wrote:I know I want to try hosting again, and I have a really cool idea for the next game, so Fuzzy, do you want to host the one after mine? If you want, though, you can go ahead of me.
I know I said I wouldn't give any more opinions, but Sentynel seemed genuinely outraged when you gave the fake seer report from the dead. A real wolf wouldn't be so pissed because they'd know the truth.Didier wrote:No. You were killed because nobody else had accused you.rubberchickenben wrote:Now ask yourselves, why was I killed? Oh, because I called out people. C'mon guys.
Think about it. The wolves want the suspected people to stay in the game.
Let me just say that the wolf cannot be N&B. When she says outright that she voted for Nero the first round, and nobody else contradicts her, then she's trustworthy.
And from experience hosting the last game, when someone writes a lengthy, well-reasoned, logical paragraph, they're probably innocent. So Sentynel is probably not a wolf.
And Wolfboy (now Mwamba) has been absent the entire game, yet the wolf-killings have been fairly efficiently delivered, so he/she is innocent.
And that leaves three: Fuzzy, Footstool, Nero.
The other possibility is that Sentynel is just really good at sounding innocent (as opposed to Gladstone, who was innocent, but managed to look more suspicious than a greasy, shifty-eyed teenager).
Don't worry, I will be less silly and plan out my semester properly next time. :Pnathanielandbartimaeus wrote:Oh sorry. You two have valid reasons to worry more so than usual. So yeah better concentrate on your exams then.
I voted. :D
I do not agree with the first part.nathanielandbartimaeus wrote:You accusing Nero makes me think Nero is a wolf too.
@Villagers: Please vote for Fuzzy this time. And fast.
