we were looking at no-one in particular...

I disagree.

under the new rule, thats spam, i should punish you really...

That was either a joke, or you do relaly disagree, in which case, sawy why


B)

I rather suspect that was a joke.
:P

Not really. I disagree.

Ptolemy123 - 1 day for spam


[/sarcasm]


Why do you disagree?

Perhaps this is targeted at me. Well then, I will play your clever game.

- puts on school uniform and begins copying notes from Gladstone. -

k. Yeah, reinforce this rule. But strictness needs to be at a tolerable level.

:P


Don't worry it wasn't targetted at you!

Yeah, well, I disgree, Okay?

PS WE LIVE IN A E DICTORSHIP!! REVOLT!!

We're only going to warn/ban people who post in 20 threads saying 'ok'.
Which has been known to happen.

It won't be 'omgz you said 'ok'! you banned!!!1111!!'

- stomps around with hand held out straight. - STROUD! Welfare Stroud!

But do not become like SSMB where they are super spam squids and delete your post even when you post in the spam/fluff forum.

We should get one of those....

But still; there's nothing wrong with two worded posts. It's not like this forum has enough people to actually get crowded.

The problem with two-worded posts is that they actually don't add anything. If the author wants just a yes or no opinion, he can add a poll. Otherwise, please give reasons.

Even worse is just going 'ok' to indicate you read somebody's reply to you or whatever. Posts like that will get short bans after one warning.

Short Ban?

Yeah. 1 day or so for the second offense (ie after a warning). Increased times for repeat offenses.