Sentynel wrote:he raids your laundry and steals socks at random

No, I steal socks for Random, they're her favourite food and she pays well for them.

You have to admit "David Cat:Sockmaster" is catchy.

FuzzyLobster wrote:You have to admit "David Cat:Sockmaster" is catchy.

Was there a need to give that statement its own post =p it seemed to be doing fine where it was...
>>

It works better chronologically there.

And we're one post closer to 100,000. :D

I like this Band. Do have any more?

Sure.
Blue Tattoo
Cool Vibes
Hellracer
Undercover Girl
Liar
I Know
When the Indians Cry
My Puzzle of Dreams

No, I've got all of those. I meant Band names.

Oh right. I'm not sure how much I have that's similar.. try Xandria or After Forever maybe?

Not as Good, athough the second one is OK... Evansence derivative.

After Forever are older than Evanescence. Evanescence didn't release Fallen until 2003; After Forever had two albums out by then. They're much more influenced by Nightwish.

You might also try Indica, who are probably slightly more similar to Vanilla Ninja than the ones I posted earlier..

I have to say, this thread made me literally lol, and as I am at the library, I received quite a few suspicious glances. ;)

Also, being extremely vain, it appears I have only 180 hits.

This one isn't mine.

The rest of the nerdy wiki ones are mine.

Of course, I have many other identities that don't involve rubber chickens.

Translation: Spends way too much time on the internet. :P

HELLS YES! -- To Mwamba's sig

rubberchickenben wrote:The rest of the nerdy wiki ones are mine.

You have multiple Blogs?

ME wrote: HELLS YES! -- To Mwamba's sig

Ditto to the avatar.

Post wrote:

rubberchickenben wrote:The rest of the nerdy wiki ones are mine.

You have multiple Blogs?

No, I don't even have one blog right now. I just edit a bunch of wikis under the guise of rubberchickenben. I've had plans to write a blog foreveer, and I certainly have content for it, I just don't have enough time. Maybe this summer.

One of them would be TVtropes, right?

And what content? Don't tell me its your amazing, interesting, everyday life.

Ouch. Why so bitter?

Post wrote:One of them would be TVtropes, right?

And what content? Don't tell me its your amazing, interesting, everyday life.

Nope. I wouldn't dare foist that sordid affair upon teh webz.

Rather, it would have random stuff I find, puns, gaming house rules, etc. and other sordid stuff that I do dare foist upon teh webz.

I forget whether I have a TVTropes account. Rather, I just like reading it for hours at a time.

Lmao, DC's Talk Page

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Tupling. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chriswiki 08:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Darkest Hour (Warriors)

Hello. The Darkest Hour (Warriors), an article you recently created, does not properly cite its sources, according to WP:CITE. Please include a full citation for every source used. Thank you. Yours truly, BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love! 20:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. This is a reply to your reply of the comment above on my talk page. According to Wikipedia policy, every article should have a reliable primary source. If you have any questions, leave a message on my talk page, or take a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability. Yours truly, BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love! 21:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. This is a reply to your comments on my talk page. The article is not properly sourced because you should include a full citation for all of the works you used as references for writing the book's analysis. If you did the analysis yourself, then you should re-write the article, because Wikipedia:No original research states that you should not include original research on Wikipedia. Yours truly, BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love! 22:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. This is a reply to your reply on my talk page. I'm afraid I don't understand. Did you copy the plot summaries from articles in Wikipedia? Or did you copy the plot summaries from the books? BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love! 01:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. This is a reply to your reply on my talk page. Thank you for explaining the situation to me. I understand you moved the information from the original page to separate, relevant pages. If this is indeed the case, then you must ask the editor who originally wrote the plot summaries where he/she got the information and include them on your articles. I hope this finally solves the problem. Yours truly, BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love! 20:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why?

Question: [1]

Reply: Because all the discussions were on that talk page to begin with and its easier to keep track of all discussions when they stay where they started. «razorclaw» 18:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Now please redo all that you undid. If you don't want to waste your time doing so, I will go ahead and do it. ;-) «razorclaw» 18:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Ignore the previous comment I just did it. Regards, «razorclaw» 19:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, articles should not be moved, as you did to The Sight (Warriors), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Just to let you know, there are other articles named "The Sight" «razorclaw» 21:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you

Thanks for joining the Warriors Wikiproject. :) Elfin341 06:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Corrie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The way, the truth, and the light 19:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corrie

This is an encyclopaedia. Encyclopaedia articles on mainstream subjects such as the glacial feature known as a corrie take precedence over informal nicknames for a soap opera, used primarily in a single country. Guy (Help!) 12:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

There already is a disambiguation page at Corrie (disambiguation). If you wanted to disambiguate, you would redirect Corrie there. You can also vote at my RM (see Talk:Corrie (disambiguation)) to do just that. The way, the truth, and the light 16:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Into the Wild (Warriors), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Metros 23:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

With regards to your comments on Talk:Warriors (book series): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Metros 16:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Late Sorry

Sorry for acting like a loser occasionally towards you. I'm hotheaded, so sorry. ~Crowstar~ 18:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Cat for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cheers, JetLover 03:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I imagine everyone here can read it for themselves, GBM...