Mwamba Higher Spirit
10 Dec 08 - 16:40
Not always, there's characters like Underwood and Pettigrew.
流口水的婊子和猴子的笨儿子。
And people like Dumbledore who had "panache".Mwamba wrote:Not always, there's characters like Underwood and Pettigrew.
That's what she said.Dansariki wrote:Not really.
She strikes me as one who works behind the scenes until she find the chance to be in charge, or finds that she prefers to be in the shadows, controlling from there.
Yes, Dumbly and Luna are cool. I'm not saying an awesome character has to be a sociopath, but in Bella's case she knew how to work it.nathanielandbartimaeus wrote:And people like Dumbledore who had "panache".Mwamba wrote:Not always, there's characters like Underwood and Pettigrew.
Do you think Jane had the flamboyant style?
That makes sense. I never considered Jane might have had prior info about the Golem. Or was it mentioned in the book? Jane tries to stop Nat from going to inquire about it, right?Dansariki wrote:Nah.
I think she was aware of it, but it was working to her advantage, so kept quite about it.
I think Hopkins and Duval were alone in that one.
1) Datsyuk's annoyingly careless like that (yes his nickname is after the amazing hockey player because Dansariki hates it)Honorius wrote:1) It's Duvall, not Duval.
2) I don't understand how Farrar and Duvall seem to be quite different... isn't Farrar Duvall's apprentice?
