FuzzyLobster Marid
14 Nov 09 - 20:17
The ending was amazing.
'Nuff said.![]()
FOUNDER OF THE SAM THE BARMAN FANCLUB: QUOTE IN YOUR SIG TO JOIN
'Nuff said.

FOUNDER OF THE SAM THE BARMAN FANCLUB: QUOTE IN YOUR SIG TO JOIN
lol thats prolly how he felt before the prequel was announcedSevenPentacles wrote:*cough* prequel *cough*
Another resource for you.periwinkle wrote:Nat falls in the category if the charismatic and calculating villain. It's a pretty standard villain in a lot of books, but he (and rarely she) is always a grown up character. I think it's awesome how we get to see how this type of man evolves out of a more or less normal, albeit very intelligent kid. The general feeling of Nat being unpleasant means that JS is consequent about writing the books from the PoV of the villains and not of the heroes.
Also, I know only one other book in which this type of character is the main character. Alright, Bart is a main character too, but his type of character (the malevolent and witty but slightly pathetic character) I've found more often. (I've been hunting books with villainous and malevolent main characters for pretty much all my life - are at least since I've been able to read books ;p)
sameVinr Alfakyn wrote:Satisfying. i mean it was very good, its just I was sad about Nat's death and the fact that the trilogy was over.
same here. i was sobbing! :'(aiReY-chan wrote:Well, if you think about it, it shocked you. It surprised you. It made you feel something. Which, in my opinion, is good.
Natty-Boy was my second fav character -or maybe my fav-, and I cried when he died, but, still.
Same. I felt the Exact same.Vinr Alfakyn wrote:Satisfying. i mean it was very good, its just I was sad about Nat's death and the fact that the trilogy was over.
Think actually most of us did :PVince wrote:Same. I felt the Exact same.