yes, but how do we know her friends are popluar?

And, Dumbledore could do a Gandalf. So Queezle.

JK Rowling said no Gandalfs for Dumbledore. You're in denial over Dumbledore's death.

We don't. But it's obvious that she's the Cho Chang of her year: Pretty, popular, athletic, slut, ect.

Yes, well, I didn't really like Cho. But, Ginny's been after Harry for so long...And he broke up with her, anyways.

Well, maybe I am in denial over Dumbledore's death. But it wasn't very glorified for one of the greatest wizards of all time, was it?

Get over it. Dumbledore was getting old, and it's not like Dumbledore could help Harry kill Voldemort.

No, but that was real life...to a degree. We live in a harsh world.

So? If Pansy had been after Harry all this time no one would like that.

Of course Dumbledore could help Harry!
He defeated that Dark Lord Grisenwald or whatever his name was.
But Pansy's not after Harry. We would probably like her better if she was,
and was nice to Harry all the time.

We all don't like Ginny because she's nice to Harry. My point is that if someone is rotten, then it doesn't matter if they've been pining after a person all their life, as that someone is still rotten.

By the way go to mugglenet.com for a possible opening of Book 7.

The movie was a load of barf. Literally. Oh well. At least I saw the trailers for "The Bourne Ultimatum" and "The Dark is Rising".

Yeah, it kinda was.
They squashed the subplots together too much and jumbled it up.
There was a trailer for the bourne ultimatum at the movie?
I saw the one for the dark is rising. It looked good.

It looked AWESOME!

I have yet to see the movie, but I think we need to realize the book is different from the movie....

But the movie barely made sense some of the time.
Though Umbridge, Bellatrix, and Luna were really really good.

Order of the Phoenix was the best HP movie yet, thank God, cuz I thought it was gonna suck.

How did it not make sense?

they stuck weird things in there.
like they didn't explain percy.
or what cho had done.

Not explaining Percy isn't sticking anything anywhere, it's cutting out. It's kind of forgivable to cut out minor things if they want the movie to be 2 1/2 hours. Percy disowning his family may have been emotional for the Weasleys, but really, there's a lot of content that had to be placed in less than 2 1/2 hours, and Percy really isn't relevant to the overall important plots or subplots.

And what's confusing about Cho? She takes on Marietta's role. Her mom works for the Ministry and she betrays the Order. 'Nuff said.

What the hell was with the Death Eaters and Order turning into smoke?

I guess it was their take on apparating.
I looked cool, but it wasn't at all how I imagined it.
What was with the different color smoke according to how evil you are?

Because it's a movie and they wanted everything dramatic.

Hmph.


I'm so excited for the seventh book!

Queezle7 wrote: they stuck weird things in there.
like they didn't explain percy.
or what cho had done.

The reason for them not being so blatant was to allow the scene to be shorter or cut out completely but still having scene that explained what happened anyway.

The film was definitely the best one so far, much more adult/dark/exciting.