You got that all thought out...

But freckles??? I see Nat as more intense and hardcore than innocent.

There's a reason I emphasised 'really' when I said look really close.

I mean, like intense and hardcore, with an innocent look mingled there. (Not that the innocent look fools anyone though.)

Nope...he's not a good actor, but he's HOT *goes all fangirl*

Luciene wrote: Nope...he's not a good actor, but he's HOT *goes all fangirl*

agreed *goes fangirl back*

BUT NAT'S MINE BITCH!! (Just kidding. )

You can have him...I'll take Kian

fine

Pissed off?? :huh:

No, that 'fine' was expressed with me being content.

I was not in anyway whatsoever .

Both of you are disturbing me.

Nice siggeh.

Where did you get the idea?

wrote: Both of you are disturbing me.

*Gasps*

I know. That statement was a little bold.

But hey, I speak my mind.

Or type it, rather.

Ianna wrote:

Nice siggeh.

Where did you get the idea?

You actually...I thing you were talking about the real war stories

I feel so special!

*in the background*

I believe I could fly...

Once again, I fear for your sanity.

Back to the actors....

Would every single one of you smack your heads against the wall if Radcliffe were Nat?

I would.

Radcliffe is a pretty nice Harry Potter.

But Nat? Hell no.

ooooh Radcliffe
I plato go back in time and tell him when he is about seven years old that if he ever plays a character in any movie, especially harry potter, I'll punch him.
And he will never become a actor.
Next thing Ive got to do is go back in time and convince Bill Gates to take up moddeling instead of computers

Uh huh.

I thought so. Just seeing if we were on the same page there.

Bill Gates, eh?

Uh, no Daniel Radcliffe is a pretty good HP. I just wished they had changed his eyes from hazel to green.

But we can agree to disagree. Right?

I thought his eyes were blue, actually.