Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome.

We hope you enjoy your visit to Bartiforums.com

Since 2005 we've been a place for Bart fans to come together, discuss the books and other things. Jonathan Stroud himself is also a member of our community and you have the chance to talk to him. All you need to do is register an account.

Once registering you'll have the ability to set up and customise your profile, and access the options to post replies. Registration is completely free. There are no costs for access to any part of our board.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: (Advanced Login)

Username:   Password:
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
Drugs. Substances. Controlled, or Not.
Topic Started: Oct 16 2010, 11:57 PM (2,689 Views)
Captain Internets
Member Avatar
Marid
Nero
Oct 19 2010, 09:29 PM
Dude, what the hell happened to your extreme beliefs?
They were sarcasm or just plain pissing people off.

And Inheritance is not total crap, your face is total crap :P
Posted Imagesentynel is gay
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
nathanielandbartimaeus
Member Avatar
Marid
Sentynel
Oct 19 2010, 09:05 PM
In America at least, execution is famously more expensive than lifetime imprisonment.
It depends on who. Like, over here, we are spending loads of money over the terrorist who was caught int he 26/11 attacks. To keep him safe and sound. In one year, we spent $70 million. The monorail plan had to be tweaked because there would be a security risk if it passed near his bomb-proof jail. Cost of tweaking the plan? $100 million. And, the people who live in the road where the jail is face loads of problem. They are forced to undergo checks or show id cards every time. All the people who had shops in that road lost business because the road is barricaded. I think it is too much for a terrorist [who was caught pretty much like you described (you might have read the reports back then); so there is no doubt of his involvement]. If you plan to just hand him the life sentence, you got to be ready to dole out millions of more dollars, and cause even more inconvenience to people living near the area. And, like the link I put up, there is always a fear that a successful attempt might be made to rescue him.
And I repeat again, I do not really believe in handing out death sentence to people. Like Da said, the state would be no different than the murderer and that is a horrible message to give out. But I think very rare exceptions can be made in certain cases. To spend so much on a worthless person, who killed and injured hundreds, does not do justice.
"If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination ... no more men!" - Einstein
"I like quoting Einstein. Know why? Because nobody dares contradict you." - Studs Terkel.
<@Ximenez> Sentynel: But i have a life? No. Qed.
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
rubberchickenben
Member Avatar
Marid
Slightly related lol
I wish I were a cat-dragon
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
FuzzyLobster
Member Avatar
Marid
Quick. Hide it before DC sees.

Speaking of which, I pretty much agree with him on the death penalty thing too. N&B, the major problem that you get with only giving the death penalty to people who definitely did commit their crime, is that it makes things unfair. The only criminals who are excuted are the ones who were not smart enough at covering their tracks, or committed crimes of passion? And who decides what is sufficient proof? Who's to stop standards slipping from, say, security camera footage to eyewitness testimony?
Posted Image

"Few injustices [can be] deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within.”
― Stephen Jay Gould

FOUNDER OF THE SAM THE BARMAN FANCLUB: QUOTE IN YOUR SIG TO JOIN
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
Sentynel
Member Avatar
Nothing But The Rain

rubberchickenben
Oct 24 2010, 01:28 AM
That's an interesting piece. Doesn't surprise me at all. Personally I choose to cope by losing myself in big complicated video games rather than marinating my brain in alcohol, but I guess the escapism's the same end result.
Sentynel - Head Ninja, Admin, Keeper of the Ban Afrit, Official Forum Graphics Guy, and forum code debugger.
A still more glorious dawn awaits, not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise, a morning filled with 400 billion suns - the rising of the Milky Way
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
nathanielandbartimaeus
Member Avatar
Marid
FuzzyLobster
Oct 24 2010, 02:02 AM
Quick. Hide it before DC sees.

Speaking of which, I pretty much agree with him on the death penalty thing too. N&B, the major problem that you get with only giving the death penalty to people who definitely did commit their crime, is that it makes things unfair. The only criminals who are excuted are the ones who were not smart enough at covering their tracks, or committed crimes of passion? And who decides what is sufficient proof? Who's to stop standards slipping from, say, security camera footage to eyewitness testimony?
Haha. I've read articles too which say that people who drink alcohol in moderation are better off (health-wise) than people who don't drink it at all.

About the death penalty, yeah, I agree with you there. Ultimately, if you go down to it, only those who get "properly caught" are the ones who get punished. And this is true for not just the death penalty. Of course, death penalty takes away someone's life, so it is even worse. The thing is, I think I'm just being a bit partial towards this case because this guy attacked my city, people I know were affected, and it affected me mentally too. Plus I think it would be very unfair to spend so much taxpayer's money on keeping him safe. And yeah, I know one must not go by feelings and emotions, but there it is.

And when someone kills and takes away the life of many people or carries out a genocide or maims, physically abuses, and tortures many children, one can't feel justice is done by simply confining that person and taking away a few rights. Justice would be done like that in a Utopian world, but reality is far different. Prisons, though far from being like they *should* be (that is, with clean facitilies for the prisoners, a good rehabilitation and recreation centre for the prisoners, where everyone is treated like humans and not animals, where no one is physcially or mentally abused by others etc.), are still far better than the conditions of many poor people, who die of starvation and dreadful diseases because of no/zero healthcare. For absolutely no fault of theirs. At least those who did the above said crimes would deserve to be punished, but these people don't. And there is corruption, which in my view, is far worse than anything else. Corruption is very different in different countries. Usually in the West it involves getting kickbacks from companies. That is okay compared to corruption of some governments in Africa and Asia. The money these governments eat are not that of the rich companies but the money which should go towards helping the poor (indeed, in most cases, money which is earmarked for free healthcare, cheap foodgrains etc. goes directly into politicians' pockets. Unnecessarily large number of people die and suffer because a government is greedy. And the people in the government know their actions are responsible for it. And, what happens to them? If ever caught, they just get punished for just taking money which is not theirs and not for wrecking the lives of millions. The terrorists are far better. They at least do not go about in the guise of *helping* people and nobody entrusts them with a job of looking after millions. Yet, corruption is never considered the same as a murder, though the two pretty much lead to the same thing: death of innocent people.

So yeah, I don't know if anyone got my point out there, but the world is a very unfair place and a terribly unequal place and to have the same laws everywhere makes little sense.
Edited by nathanielandbartimaeus, Oct 24 2010, 12:19 PM.
"If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination ... no more men!" - Einstein
"I like quoting Einstein. Know why? Because nobody dares contradict you." - Studs Terkel.
<@Ximenez> Sentynel: But i have a life? No. Qed.
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
Epic_Footstool
Member Avatar
Utukku
I agree with what's been said about the death penalty so far. The law needs to be something people can see as a constant and while there will obviously be exceptions, it's important to at least have a rule which works for the majority of cases. You just can't utilitarianise something like the death penalty, especially because of so many of the variables mentioned (the credibility of eyewitness accounts, ulterior motives for confessing, improbability of ascertaining 100% innocence etc).

As DC said, the executors would become like the very people they are executing, and that if a person were given the death penalty mistakenly, it would simply not be acceptable. As we're unfortunately all too aware of, death isn't reversible, and the chances of convicting the wrong person are all too high.
Posted Image
As of now, I think the number of proven wrongful executions stands at around 8 or 10 (with several more suspected ones), but imagine if those exonerated had also been wrongfully executed before they were proven innocent? While giving someone a life sentence may not necessarily "measure up" to the crimes they've committed, surely it has to be better than killing?

This actually brings to mind an episode of Boston Legal I saw a while back. They had to defend a death-row inmate in Texas who couldn't even remember committing the murder he was charged for. He refused to plead not guilty only because he thought that he must have committed the murders if that's what he was being charged for. There was DNA evidence suggesting another possible suspect, only two eyewitnesses (who merely saw him at the scene of the crime a while before it happened) and also the fact that he was probably incapable of committing the crime he was charged with because he had an IQ of less than 80. When it came down to it, the courts sentenced him to death by lethal injection. His last words were "I don't know if I did it...but if I did, I'm sorry." With the amount of doubt there was surrounding his guilt, it was horrifying to watch that happen to a probably innocent person - heck, I'd be lying if I said it wouldn't be horrific to see someone who was actually guilty die like that. Even the possibility of a case ending up like this in reality is too much, in my opinion.
Bartimaeus: It won't be the only mad thing about if you let this lot go. Check out that one at the end. He's taken the form of a footstool. Weird...but somehow I like his style.
Nathaniel: That is a footstool. No one's using that Pentacle.
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
nathanielandbartimaeus
Member Avatar
Marid
Oh, that is real bad. Yeah, I've read quite a few death penalty cases in the US could actually have resulted in innocents being executed. It is terrible. And there was also this case about a very "punctual" judge in the US; she refused to extend the time for a hearing and the person who was being tried then was hanged on the same day/the next (forgot which). In spite of his lawyers wanting to file a further appeal.
All said and done, law is far from perfect. Like I already mentioned in my previous post, it doesn't take into account other things which a person's action might have resulted in, and also sometimes judgments (like punishing people by circumstantial evidence) results in many innocents being handed jail terms to serve.

Yes, I do get all your points against the death sentence and I think they are very good ones too and I agree with them all. And, like I mentioned many times, I don't support death penalty in principle. But it depends from place to place, right? I mean, if a majority of people in a country lead very sorry lives it wouldn't make sense to spend millions on just one person who doesn't deserve it. If a majority did spend decent lives, it would be okay I suppose. Of course, like I already said, people who have committed heinous crimes are far better off in jail than millions who live outside and who have done no wrong and who suffer far more (and obviously the ones in jail deserve to live a life of full dignity and in a good environment; I'm just pointing out how weird it is) But I guess that is life.

Okay fine, he should at least be made to clean toilets all his life.

And all this talk about death sentence has resulted in this ad:
Support Death Penalty?
Do you support Capital Punishment? Answer this 3 second poll
capital-punishment.net/
Edited by nathanielandbartimaeus, Oct 24 2010, 05:40 PM.
"If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. No more bees, no more pollination ... no more men!" - Einstein
"I like quoting Einstein. Know why? Because nobody dares contradict you." - Studs Terkel.
<@Ximenez> Sentynel: But i have a life? No. Qed.
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
FuzzyLobster
Member Avatar
Marid
N&B
 
Haha. I've read articles too which say that people who drink alcohol in moderation are better off (health-wise) than people who don't drink it at all.

Which DC brings up at every possible opportunity. :P

N&B
 
Okay fine, he should at least be made to clean toilets all his life.

Sounds fair. :D

At least with all the money being spent, his supporters can never say he wasn't treated unfairly. Not much of a consolation, but...



Posted Image

"Few injustices [can be] deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within.”
― Stephen Jay Gould

FOUNDER OF THE SAM THE BARMAN FANCLUB: QUOTE IN YOUR SIG TO JOIN
Offline Profile _Quote Top
 
2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Chat · Next Topic »
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4