| Welcome. We hope you enjoy your visit to Bartiforums.com Since 2005 we've been a place for Bart fans to come together, discuss the books and other things. Jonathan Stroud himself is also a member of our community and you have the chance to talk to him. All you need to do is register an account. Once registering you'll have the ability to set up and customise your profile, and access the options to post replies. Registration is completely free. There are no costs for access to any part of our board. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: (Advanced Login) |
| Creation Vs Evolution. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 6 2006, 05:31 PM (7,964 Views) | |
| Gladstone | Jul 2 2006, 10:23 AM Post #76 |
![]()
|
Okay:
And the other.
|
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 10:35 AM Post #77 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
Hodge, you agree? Tell me how you justify that. |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Hodge | Jul 2 2006, 03:25 PM Post #78 |
|
Mouler
|
We are supposed to turn the other cheek. Revenge is the Lords. |
| |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Gladstone | Jul 2 2006, 03:46 PM Post #79 |
![]()
|
And how did you work that one out? |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Krim | Jul 2 2006, 04:05 PM Post #80 |
![]()
Djinni
|
Looks like revenge is the husband's for now.
What context is this taken out of? What exactly is happening to Jesus and his followers? |
|
Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Stroud/Gladstone The three ships. Kinda like the Mayflower and all those. | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 04:17 PM Post #81 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
HEATHENS, UNITE. Arguement against Creationilism: Creation believes in 'Everything out of nothing', creatio ex nihilo. Patently wrong, for everything their has to something, a first clause, you may argue God was the first clause, maybe. Did he say "Let there be light" and there was light? If that was so, what was before that? Who said "Let there be God"? There is a fundemental difference between the scientific method of doing things and the godmen's method of doing things. The scientific method uses observation, hypothesis and deductions to advance things, Predictions are testable by experimentation. If the theory is correct, it lives, if it is wrong, the paper shredder gets some work to do. In principle, the scientific method does not seek answers that fit a certain pre-determined conclusion, but rather works to construct viable, testable, and provable theories based on a solid evidential foundation. The evidential foundation therefore precludes any reference to revelation. Creationists, on the other hand, work by taking the scriptures as their primary source of imformation. Effectively they already have the answer before the question. Their holy books take preminance as evidence, this is not the scientific method, it is a return to medievilism. The genesis claims the world was created in 'six days' within the past ten thousand years. Patently absurd, it goes against everything from carbon dating to fossil records. As for evolution, even if one does not take in the fossil record as evidence, we still have many examples of evolution within the past century. Tuskless Elephants, for example. Poachers favored to kill Elephants with large tusks, over time, cases of Elephants that grew without tusks increased, now they form a sizeble part of the general population. Or maybe Drug Resistant Bacteria? Samurai Crabs? Roaches? You name it, their evolving. DNA analysis has proved we share 50% of our DNA with yeast, 98% with Chimps; certainly not looking good for special creation, does it? Or is mordern Biology all wrong? "Any sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic" said HG Wells, and I agree. "If you tell a lie big enough and often enough, it becomes the truth" Said Hitler, and I agree. |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Hodge | Jul 2 2006, 05:19 PM Post #82 |
|
Mouler
|
Who said " Let there be a dot no bigger than a period that will explode and create the Universe?"
It has been proven many times that the tests were faulty and wrong, so, therefore, the paper shredder's working overtime.
Again, those tests were faulty and wrong.
It means they all came from the same superior being, that is, God.
Darwin believed him too.
By the Lord's permission.
Jesus has ascended into heaven after he died and rose again, and his disciples are being persecuted (much like today). This is from Romans, which is a letter from Paul being sent to the church in Rome. :krim: |
| |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 05:24 PM Post #83 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
Everything can not be wrong. We are mountains of evidence here.
Mmm... point. But you haven't explained recent evolution.
Ouch. |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Krim | Jul 2 2006, 05:26 PM Post #84 |
![]()
Djinni
|
Read my post above your's, Hodge.
Sources?
Sources?
Sources?
...HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. I'm not even going to say sources here, you have no source other than creationists who are angsty because evolution goes against the Bible.
So uh...I'm looking for where this says 'God will deal with all problems of man.' Looks like this is referring to Jesus' death, not revenge for man... |
|
Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Stroud/Gladstone The three ships. Kinda like the Mayflower and all those. | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 05:33 PM Post #85 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
That's a matter of faith, Krim. Although, A link debunking 50 years of Geology will be nice, Hodge. |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Krim | Jul 2 2006, 05:36 PM Post #86 |
![]()
Djinni
|
Even if carbon dating is unreliable, it's easy to see that there has been an alteration through fossils, such as feathered dinosaurs in the process of evolving into birds. Even if carbon dating is unreliable and off by a grand sum, there is certainly without any shadow of a doubt fossils and rocks beyond ten thousand years old. Or is evolution just a test so God can see who remains faithful?
|
|
Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Stroud/Gladstone The three ships. Kinda like the Mayflower and all those. | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 05:39 PM Post #87 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
When, junk the genesis's date and say the fossils were but God's rejects in his quest to create sentinent humans... Whatever. THE LINK, HODGE, THE LINK |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Krim | Jul 2 2006, 05:41 PM Post #88 |
![]()
Djinni
|
Why would God, omnipotent, forging humans in his own image, make a feathered dinosaur and then go 'oh, this has too many scales' and decide instead to make a flesh bag? He'll most likely link to a creationist site like Ken Hovind, and then we'll waste another hour explaining why 'Dr. Dino' is a hack. |
|
Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Stroud/Gladstone The three ships. Kinda like the Mayflower and all those. | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Post | Jul 2 2006, 05:46 PM Post #89 |
|
Higher Spirit
|
You know, there's a math equation to measure the possibility of an omnipotent being. A spin off of the alien measuring equation (Can't remember the name right now), It calculated in the 70s%. |
| Shame of the Super Son | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| Krim | Jul 2 2006, 05:48 PM Post #90 |
![]()
Djinni
|
...okay. |
|
Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Gladstone/Sentynel/Krim/Stroud/Gladstone The three ships. Kinda like the Mayflower and all those. | |
| Offline Profile | _Quote Top |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Chat · Next Topic » |

Search
Members
Rules
IRC
Help
Settings
Messaging (
Sign Out



6:57 PM Jul 11